🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial move to prohibit social platforms access for young people below 16 is creating waves internationally. Officials, safety advocates, and families are monitoring with great interest to see if this tactic will become a template for countries abroad.

European Momentum

Throughout Europe, a increasing group of nations are moving toward comparable bans.

• The Danish government plans a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM arguing that phones and networks are "stealing our kids' innocence". The policy may be passed next year.
• Norway is preparing to enforce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to shield young people from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• Ireland is working on a digital wallet to authenticate the user details of social media users. Authorities have stated that an similar ban is "one of the options in reserve".
• In Spain, the prime minister has called on the legislature to approve a bill increasing the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has recommended a related action, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has urged families to block their kids from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has adopted a non-binding resolution demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 except if a parent decides otherwise is provided. Although it highlights of the "compulsive" design of these services, the step does not establish mandatory rules.

"A clear age limit is a solid foundation," stated a leading parliamentarian behind the measure.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Eye

In the UK, the government has remained open to a potential ban, emphasizing that "nothing is being dismissed" but maintaining any action must be "based on robust evidence".

Earlier, support gathered behind a proposal to introduce limits on social media use by minors, but it was in the end watered down. Instead, the government vowed to investigate the topic.

Campaign organizations have voiced warnings. A prominent charity founded by the loved ones of a girl who died after being exposed to dangerous social media material suggests that a strict age ban might not improve online safety and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of risk when teens become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a response to the refusal of the social media companies to build tools that are safe and fit for minors," stated a influential child protection advocate.

The United States: A State-by-State Approach

Stateside, action is mostly unfolding at the state government level against a backdrop of federal gridlock.

• Utah demands adult approval for minors to use social media and limits overnight use.
• The state of Florida has signed a bill prohibiting children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has enacted a regulation capping teenagers to a single hour of social media access per day, with extra use requiring adult consent.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly introduced measures requiring guardian approval for under-16s to create social media presences.

Even with cross-party agreement and calls from various individuals to mimic Australia's lead, a federal ban is presently seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Views

Apart from Europe and the US, further states are also taking action.

• Malaysia intends to ban social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• Brazil has raised the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, international bodies strike a more nuanced stance. A major UN agency has cautioned that social media bans carry risks and "may even prove counterproductive". The agency highlights that social networks can be a "critical link" for isolated youth and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to prioritize user protection.

Even as this worldwide discussion evolves, the policies of Australia and its followers indicate that governments around the world are no longer willing to wait for platforms to self-regulate.