🔗 Share this article

The ninth circuit court has upheld a ban on deploying state troops in Portland, Oregon, after a latest legal decision.

Appeals Court Concurs to Rehear Legal Matter

The federal appeals court decided on Tuesday that it would reexamine the case concerning the executive power with an larger group of eleven justices. The court also overturned a previous ruling from a smaller judicial group that had supported the federal government.

Ongoing Dispute Over Military Presence

This legal directive represents the latest turn in a long-running court case over whether the administration has the legal right and justification to deploy state military units in the city. Approximately two hundred troops have been in limbo since late September when the mobilization attempt was initiated in due to months of protests.

Differing Viewpoints

The administration has claimed that government employees at the immigration center in south Portland were under attack, while city and state officials maintain that municipal police have control of the situation.

In defiance of characterizations of the city as “war ravaged”, residents have been sharing videos of scenic paths and a thriving food scene, and planning activities such as an protest bicycle event against the increased military presence.

Recent Legal Actions

The appeals court decision came after a US district judge in the city issued two temporary restraining orders this month – one preventing the federal control of the state troops, and another stopping the deployment of any military personnel in the state, after efforts to circumvent the initial injunction by mobilizing troops from California.

On Monday, the ninth circuit panel had put the first ruling on hold – permitting control of state troops – but the second ruling stayed effective, preventing the physical sending of the troops.

En Banc Review

The Tuesday decision means the issue will be heard “en banc” – with both rulings under review simultaneously – by a panel of eleven justices.

“This decision demonstrates that facts are important and that the judicial system are working to hold this administration accountable. The founding document restricts the executive authority, and Oregon’s communities cannot be treated as a testing site for expansive government power,” stated the state attorney general in a statement.

“The judicial body is sending a clear message: the president cannot dispatch the armed forces into American urban areas unnecessarily. We will continue defending state legislation, principles, and autonomy as this case moves forward and our fight continues in the courts.”